Argumentation-based agents for eProcurement

نویسندگان

  • Paul-Amaury Matt
  • Francesca Toni
  • Thanassis Stournaras
  • Dimitris Dimitrelos
چکیده

Procurement is the complete process of obtaining goods and services – from preparation and processing of a requisition through to receipt and approval of the invoice for payment. The support for eProcurement is important for realising agent-based eBusiness applications. This paper proposes the use of argumentation-based agents to support the selection of suppliers for goods and services within the negotiation phase of procurement. Argumentation is used to compare candidate suppliers and identify the one that best meets the buyer’s business-specific needs. The use of argumentationbased technology presents important advantages over traditional procurement methods such as competitive bidding, direct negotiation or single-source acquisition in that it can cope with qualitative uncertainty and preferences as well as the construction of contracts. We apply the method to the industrial procurement of an eOrdering system.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Multi-Agent Decision Making with Assumption-based Argumentation

Much research has been devoted in recent years to argumentationbased decision making. However, less attention has been given to argumentation-based decision making amongst multiple agents. We present a multi-agent decision framework based on Assumptionbased Argumentation. In our model, agents have goals and decisions have attributes which satisfy goals. Our framework supports agents with differ...

متن کامل

An Argumentation Based Approach to Multi-Agent Learning

This paper addresses the issue of learning from communication among agents that work in the same domain, are capable of learning from examples, and communicate using an argumentative framework. We will present (1) an argumentation framework for Case-Based Reasoning agents and (2) an individual policy for agents to generate arguments and counterarguments (including counterexamples). We focus on ...

متن کامل

Dialogical two-agent decision making with assumption-based argumentation

Much research has been devoted in recent years to argumentationbased decision making. However, less attention has been given to argumentation-based decision making amongst multiple agents. We present a multi-agent decision framework based on Assumptionbased Argumentation. In our model, agents have goals and decisions have attributes which satisfy goals. Our framework supports agents with differ...

متن کامل

Case-based strategies for argumentation dialogues in agent societies

In multi-agent systems, agents perform complex tasks that require different levels of intelligence and give rise to interactions among them. From these interactions, conflicts of opinion can arise, especially when these systems become open, with heterogeneous agents dynamically entering or leaving the system. Therefore, agents willing to participate in this type of system will be required to in...

متن کامل

Argumentation-Based Communication between Agents

One approach to agent communication is to insist that agents not only send messages, but support them with reasons why those messages are appropriate. This is argumentation-based communication. This chapter looks at some of our work on argumentation-based communication, focusing on issues which we think apply to all work in this area, and discussing what we feel are the important issues in deve...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008